Skip to main content

Yet Another Discussion of Data

DATA IS GOING TO FIX ALL THE PROBLEMS IN EDUCATION EVER.


Yeah. I agree with the android. [source]
Thus begins (another) Monday morning staff meeting. What do you see? What are the tendencies? Students are numbers - gosh, however will we get those numbers up? We have to show growth. Bigger, stronger, higher, faster, better.

Gross.

And here I was. In the back (as usual) muttering to myself and writing my observations on the spreadsheet. My observation was this:

"What are Ss LOOKING FORWARD to?"
I looked at all those numbers, and the main thing I could see was that students seemed to enjoy coming to school in first grade, second grade, then in third grade it levels out, drops in fourth, and is lowest of all in fifth. My takeaway was not that students were giving up - these numbers didn't show me that kids were finally deciding that they were "bad" at doing school and weren't going to try anymore. They'd have dropped off sharply if that were the case. Nor does it show me that school is really, really hard in the intermediate grades. It shows me that students don't feel engaged. They're not excited about discovering things.

I discussed this with my tablemates: my partner in crime teaching, Peaches, and our Life Skills teacher. We were all in agreement. Enter the principal. Now, I love my principal. Really, I do. But she wants to direct instruction the crap out of "Grit" and "Perseverance" and those other things that are so en vogue right now. (And then we'll put a number on it, track it, make some goals, and fix it! Check! That! Box!) She asked how I explicitly make sure students have joy* in music. How I get them to try when it's hard or scary. How I could help them carry that mindset into the classroom.

I grimaced. 

Still though, I shared when asked. I looked around the room at the faces. Some glared, because what could a specialist possibly know about the reality of teaching? Of course I'd advocate for joy - I teach happy fun time. Others looked ashamed. That's not my goal at all. I'm not shaming you into PBL or hashtaggy-cool-new-thing, or whatever. I just want you to remember that small humans spend a lot of time with you. And you are a cool person. You should get to be yourself between 8 and 4.

This leads to a conversation with Hypothetical Teacher in my head:

ME
Students will persevere if they are invested in what they are doing.

HYPOTHETICAL TEACHER (H.T.)
But I have to teach these standards - I have to be on this page on this day!

ME
Students will look forward to school if they are engaged.

H.T.
No, I mean it about those standards though. They won't be ready for The Test.

ME
Hey. Hush about the standards for a second. You will meet them if you teach how you know is right.

H.T.
But that's not what Teacher Next Door is doing. Or Teacher on Pinterest. Or Teachers Pay Teachers.

ME
You are a different human than them. With different humans in front of you.

H.T.
(long pause)

ME
It's okay.

H.T.
Still nope. I can't do it.

ME
Sigh.


It's nice to be able to quantify that this many students met this objective on this day, but I think teachers and administrators don't get the time to actually dig in and discover what those numbers mean. How many of those students ate breakfast that day? How could you compare student achievement on days they eat versus days they don't? What's the trend where students are taught with curricular fidelity versus teacher best practices? What are the questions inside the numbers? How can these numbers empower you and your students rather than demean you?

I never have answers. Neither should you. The questions should stir you to think and make more questions because wondering is how we improve and really innovate. The innovation that means something. To me, that's the purpose of data. 

That, and being a Lieutenant Commander, of course.





*Note: I could go on and on about joy. For days. It's kind of my Thing. My Edufamous Edubook of Eduawesome would probably be about joy, but I hear joy is becoming the new Big Idea, so I'll leave the authorship to the Important People. I'll write about it here, of course, but I'm pretty sure someone's already got that covered for you in paperback. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wishing for Trouble

 I didn't get in trouble today, and that's a problem. The day is young. There's still time. And I'm sure that my parent letter tomorrow will be met with resistance from several readers. But I should have gotten in trouble today. I was already worried yesterday about how to approach yesterday's treasonous insurrection with my students. Like you may know, though I'm in the middle of my career, this is the first time I've been a grade-level teacher with a classroom of students of my own. You also may know that I'm in a very conservative part of a very conservative state - my neighbor, a Guatemalan immigrant, still has his Idahoans for Trump flag flying proudly because he's white. My other neighbor, who is a Vietnamese immigrant also complains about the "immigrants who are stealing our jobs" when I see her at the mailbox. That's where I'm from. There's the context about what America looks like for some of you who might not see how d

A List That Actually Matters

I sort of wanted to give this post a cutesy title, like "My Edu-Valentines," but I'm incredibly serious about this. Yesterday, two of my favorite people on the planet, people I like and admire, were included in an exceedingly disappointing list of inspirational educators . (excuse me, "educationists.") They were both livid. As they should have been. The list was lily white and lacking women. Most of the people were not actually  teachers - which you know, makes them a lot less inspirational to those of us who spend our days surrounded with the bright future of the world. AND THEN, after being called out for the poor quality of the list, the author - who is not a teacher, but a "blogger and digital marketing biz" person and moderator of #GuruChats - about branding (of which I have  many thoughts ) - asked for suggestions to improve it. Okay, the first one is do your homework, don't run an algorithm. But then I took a couple of moments to sc

Hands on top...*

This whole post might be off, but I don't think so. | Source  Everyone has a Thing in education they just can't abide. I've worked with teachers who disagree with numbering students or allowing bathroom breaks outside of lunch and recess. There's the much maligned clip chart. I personally lose my stuffing when teachers keep students out of Music because they're missing work in class. But there's something else that's creeping up right behind that as my number one classroom no-no. Attention Getters. You know, the Power Teaching "Class" - "Yes" or the sing-songy call and response, "One, two, three. Eyes on me!" - "One, two, eyes on you!" There's a million of them, as many as there are really great teachers who use them. I certainly don't want to disparage the teachers who rely on them. Teachers use what works for them, and we're all individuals, right? Well, yes. Of course. But my problem is t